The following information applies
only to the newest version of the Vortex Fuel Saver.There are abundant studies, on a variety of
engines, from around the world, on the predecessor version of the system. While there are numerous Vortex customer testimonials, due to the multitude of variables while driving, your results could be substantially different. The following reports/letters are from or about people or companies that should have more credibility:
Truck Fleets -- Vortex tested five 18-wheelers from four different fleets and achieved a fuel economy increase of 16%. Ten other trucks from the four fleets were also tested as part of the study, but the five with the best system beat the other 10 trucks handily. The Truck Fleet report is available as a PDF file.
Irrigation Pumps -- Vortex technology was tested on irrigation pumps, in a laboratory, by a well respected third party testing company, which also does testing for Fortune 500 companies. Testing included an A-B-A test (without Vortex, with Vortex and without again) to prove the efficacy of the technology. The irrigation pump report is available as a PDF file.
Government -- Testimonial letter from Ralph P. Santaniello, International Trade Specialist, New York State Department of Economic Development.
Battle Creek Transit (MI) achieved over 30% savings on a medium duty diesel ten passenger cutaway van and has since purchased additional Vortex Fuel Savers for their entire fleet of 20-foot buses.
Media -- News 12 (NJ) -- Before and after emissions tests on News 12's (NJ) 2005 Chevy Equinox LS, June 18 and August 27, 2008.
Mechanics -- Keith Rotzi, a graduate of the NASCAR Institute of Technology and NASCAR driver on the mileage increases for his 1996 Chevrolet Suburban (diesel) and on his 2003 Chevrolet S-10 pick up truck.
Juan Valentin, whose 1994 Volvo failed New York state's emission test and then passed after the installation of a Vortex Fuel Saver. One of the highest ever percentage increases in Miles per Gallon.
Disclaimer:
Mileage and savings may vary due to age and condition of engine,
equipment, roads and driving habits. Fluid conditioning claims are
suggestive based on pre-patent research, reviews of the literature and
state of the art.